Attention A T users. To access the menus on this page please perform the following steps. 1. Please switch auto forms mode to off. 2. Hit enter to expand a main menu option (Health, Benefits, etc). 3. To enter and activate the submenu links, hit the down arrow. You will now be able to tab or arrow up or down through the submenu options to access/activate the submenu links.

Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease

Menu
Menu
Quick Links
Veterans Crisis Line Badge
My healthevet badge
 

TNM Staging

for Health Care Providers

Staging and Prognosis - Liver Cancer

Prognosis and choosing a staging system

Staging is essential for the optimal management of HCC, as a wide variety of treatments are applied based on stage. Residual hepatic function and tumor extent tend to be the two factors that most influence prognosis. Hepatic function is usually assessed by the Child-Pugh classification or the MELD score.

No single scoring system for HCC staging has been accepted as the best one. Widely used systems include the Okuda system, the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) system of the International Union Against Cancer, the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system, and several others. The TNM system takes into account only the extent of the tumor; the Okuda system adds serum albumin, serum bilirubin, and the extent of ascites; and the CLIP system includes Child-Pugh class, tumor morphology, whether the AFP is 400 ng/mL or greater, and the presence or absence of portal vein thrombosis. The BCLC system is similar to the CLIP but incorporates the patient's performance status and does not include AFP. A study comparing 7 staging systems in a group of U.S. HCC patients found that all 7 were valid, with survival declining in direct correlation with higher score, but that the BCLC system had the best independent predictive power for survival. Practitioners caring for many HCC patients will find it useful to have a working knowledge of several of the systems.

The median survival of HCC patients after diagnosis has generally been a little more than 1 year. Survival is usually between 3 and 6 months if a patient is diagnosed after the onset of symptoms. Median survivals as short as 8 to 10 weeks have been reported in some studies, including a retrospective study of 157 untreated patients, 18% of whom had extrahepatic metastases at diagnosis. Causes of death in these patients were upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 34%, cancer-related causes (cachexia and metastatic disease) in 32%, and hepatic failure in 25%.

Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging system

StageTNMRegional LNMDistant Metastasis
IT1N0M0
IIT2N0M0
IIIT1N1M0
T2N1M0
T3N0, N1M0
IVAT4Any NM0
IVBAny TAny NM1
  • LNM: lymph node metastasis
  • T1: solitary <= 2 cm, no vascular invasion
  • T2: i) solitary <= 2 cm, vascular invasion; ii) multiple, one lobe, <= 2 cm, no vascular invasion; or iii) solitary, > 2 cm, no vascular invasion
  • T3: i) solitary, > 2 cm, vascular invasion; ii) multiple, one lobe >= 2 cm, no vascular invasion; or iii) multiple, one lobe, > 2 cm, with or without vascular invasion
  • T4: multiple, more than one lobe, invasion of major branch of portal or hepatic vein
  • N0: no regional lymph node metastasis
  • N1: regional lymph node metastasis
  • M0: no distant metastasis
  • M1: distant metastasis

Adapted from Yu AS and Keeffe EB. Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2003;3(i):8-24.

Okuda staging system

The Okuda staging system classifies patients into three stages based on the following variables.

CriterionCut-Off

*Largest cross-sectional area of tumor relative to largest cross-sectional area of liver.

Tumor size*> 50% = "+", < 50% = "-"
AscitesClinically detectable = "+"; undetectable = "-"
Serum albumin< 3 g/dl = "+"; >= 3 g/dl = "-"
Serum bilirubin> 3 mg/dl = "+"; < 3 mg/dl = "-"
StageNumber of Criteria
INo positives
IIOne or two positives
IIIThree or four positives

Adapted from: Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H, et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patientsLink will take you outside the VA website.. Cancer 1985;56:918-928.

CLIP scoring system

VariablesScore: 0Score: 1Score: 2

The CLIP score for a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma is calculated by assigning a score (0, 1, or 2) to each of four clinical factors: a) Child-Pugh stage; b) number of tumor nodules and whether the tumor extends through 50% or less, or more than 50%, of the liver; c) AFP; and d) portal vein thrombosis.

These scores are added together to yield a CLIP score of 0-6, with median survival by CLIP score as follows:

0 = 42.5 months
1 = 32.0 months
2 = 16.5 months
3 = 4.5 months
4 = 2.5 months
5-6 = 1 month

Child-Pugh stageABC
Tumor morphologyuninodular and extension ≤ 50%multinodular and extension ≤ 50%massive or extension > 50%
AFP (ng/dL)< 400≥ 400
Portal vein thrombosisnoyes

References

References for this page are listed on the Background and Epidemiology page.